Most read 16.7.2023
16min read

Unveiling the Veil: How Communist Propaganda Concealed the Truth of the Chornobyl Nuclear Disaster

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster remains one of the most catastrophic events in human history, with far-reaching consequences that are still felt today. However, what many people may not be aware of is how the Communist regime at the time meticulously crafted a web of propaganda to hide the severity of the disaster from the public. In this blog, we will explore the methods employed by the Soviet government to conceal the truth and the impact this propaganda had on the perception and understanding of the Chernobyl disaster.

At the beginning of 1985, the “young and promising” 54-year-old Mikhail Gorbachev came to power, by Soviet standards, who almost immediately announced a course of belated reforms – the so-called “perestroika“, which ended in the natural collapse of the USSR.

In this context, the main shift was supposed to be publicity — the openness of state institutions and freedom of speech in the mass media, the removal of censorship and the permission of previously banned works and films. There were indeed concessions, first of all, they allowed the publication of works that were banned and critical of the Soviet system.

The situation turned out to be much more complicated with the openness and truthfulness of the mass media. A year after Gorbachev’s coming to power and the declared course of perestroika, the Chernobyl disaster occurred, which quickly showed that ” publicity” was just a slogan that no one was really going to follow.

ImageNewspaper “Komsomolska Pravda” from April 29, 1986 on the first page there is no informational note about the accident at the Chernobyl NPP

The Chernobyl NPP, which began to be built in May 1970, was problematic almost immediately. Control over site selection and construction from the very beginning was carried out from Moscow, the Ukrainian SSR was effectively removed from decision-making. Already at the first stages of work, there were significant violations, the reasons for which are quite classic for the USSR – low-quality materials and unjustified haste to put the first power unit into operation before the next congress of the CPSU. The theft of building materials was not an isolated incident.

“In certain areas of the second unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, facts of departure from projects and violations of the technology of construction and installation work were recorded, which can lead to accidents and accidents,” – from the KGB report of January 17, 1979.

ImageChernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1983/1984
Source: Reddit 

The first accidents at the station began 8 years before the disaster, after the first power unit was launched. There were three radiation leaks at the station in 1982, 1983, and 1984. All these cases were carefully concealed by the KGB and never reported to the general public.

Only the truth and nothing but the “soviet truth”.

ImageSource: Reddit

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster was a major event in the history of the Soviet Union, and it was also a major test of the Soviet Union’s propaganda machine. The Soviet government initially tried to conceal the truth about the disaster, but the news eventually leaked out, and the international community was outraged.

Soviet propaganda was a comprehensive and systematic effort to control the flow of information and shape public opinion in the Soviet Union. It was used to promote the communist ideology, legitimize the Soviet government, mobilize the population behind its policies or to cover one of the most horrible nuclear disasters in human history – the Chernobyl disaster. 

Soviet propaganda was a comprehensive and systematic effort to control the flow of information and shape public opinion in the Soviet Union. It was used to promote the communist ideology, legitimize the Soviet government, and mobilize the population behind its policies.

Here are some of the key ways and methods of Soviet propaganda:

  • Use of simple language and images: Soviet propaganda was designed to be easily understood by the average person. The language was often simple and straightforward, and the images were often graphic and emotional.
  • Use of repetition: Soviet propaganda was often repeated over and over again. This was done to make the messages more memorable and to create a sense of familiarity.
  • Appeal to emotions: Soviet propaganda often appealed to people’s emotions, such as fear, anger, and patriotism. This was done to make the messages more powerful and to motivate people to take action.
  • Use of symbols: Soviet propaganda often used symbols, such as the hammer and sickle, to convey its messages. These symbols were designed to be easily recognized and to evoke strong emotions.

Another main point of the Soviet government propaganda was a variety of methods to spread “their truth”:

  • Control of the media: The Soviet government controlled all major media outlets, including newspapers, magazines, radio, and television. This allowed the government to censor information and disseminate its own messages.
  • Use of propaganda posters: Propaganda posters were a common sight in the Soviet Union. They often depicted idealized images of Soviet life or warned of the dangers of capitalism.
  • Mass rallies and demonstrations: Mass rallies and demonstrations were another way that the Soviet government spread propaganda. These events were often used to celebrate Soviet achievements or to rally support for government policies.
  • Education: The Soviet government also used the education system to spread propaganda. Textbooks, teachers, and other educational materials were all used to promote the communist ideology.
  • Cult of personality: The Soviet government created a cult of personality around its leaders, especially Joseph Stalin. This was done to make the leaders appear larger-than-life and to instill loyalty in the population.

Soviet propaganda was effective in shaping public opinion in the Soviet Union. However, it was not without its critics. Some people saw it as a form of brainwashing, while others felt that it was necessary to maintain social order.

The same fate awaited coverage of the Chernobyl disaster:

  1. First, the Soviet government initially denied that there had been any accident at all. When it became clear that this was not possible, they downplayed the severity of the disaster. They claimed that there was no danger to the public, and that the radiation levels were not high. They also tried to blame the accident on human error (remember Anatoly Dyatlov?), rather than on any systemic problems with the Soviet nuclear program.
  2. Second, the Soviet government censored all information about the disaster. They prevented journalists from reporting on it, and they blocked access to the affected areas. They also tried to control the flow of information through the media, and they even threatened to arrest anyone who spoke out about the disaster.
  3. Third, the Soviet government used propaganda to try to persuade the public that there was nothing to worry about. They released false information about the radiation levels, and they claimed that the disaster was under control. They also used patriotic appeals to try to rally support for the government.

The Soviet government’s efforts to conceal the truth of the Chernobyl disaster were ultimately unsuccessful. The news eventually leaked out, and the international community was outraged. The disaster led to a loss of confidence in the Soviet government, and it contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union a few years later.

“Soviet reactors do not explode”

ImageDestroyed reactor 4 at the Chernobyl NPP, April, 1986.
Photo: Unknown

When the fourth power unit of the nuclear power plant exploded on April 26, 1986, the first desire of the Soviet leadership was to hide the fact of the accident as quickly as possible and, if possible, eliminate the consequences inconspicuously. However, the realization that a real man-made disaster had occurred near Kyiv did not come immediately.

Soviet experts had little idea of the threats posed by radiation emissions. On April 28, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine Volodymyr Shcherbytskyi received a report from the KGB that the level of radiation at the 3rd and 4th power units was 1,000-2,600 micro-roentgens per second, in some areas of Pripyat — 30-160. On the document opposite these data, he put his famous note with the question: “What does this mean?“.

ImageThis was one of the first reports about what the Chernobyl disaster looked like in the press of Soviet Ukraine – in the third or fourth column, under the results of football matches and chess tournaments. In the photo – “Robitnycha gazeta” (“Workers’ newspaper”), April 29, 1986.

The Soviet leadership literally had to break the silence, because a sharp increase in the radiation background was noticed in Sweden and Denmark, and later in a number of other countries. The Soviet government was literally flooded with appeals and demands to explain the situation.

ImageWochenpost (Weekly Mail) newspaper from April 1996. The newspaper contains a long article titled “Chernobyl – Campaign of Lies” about the Chernobyl accident cover-up by the communist government of East Germany.

In the newspapers of that time, the situation in Chornobyl was presented as an accident that did not threaten the population, often these reports “exposed the lies” of the Western countries, which openly began to accuse the USSR of hiding the radiation disaster.

ImageNew York Daily News covers the Chernobyl disaster on April 29, 1986.
Source: New York Daily News

In response to the alarming reaction from the West to the abnormal increase in the level of the radioactive background, the government emphasized the purely technical side of the tragedy and assured that estimates of its scale were greatly exaggerated

The first official announcement in the USSR was made on April 28 under the pressure of the international community, but it did not even mention the extent of the problem.

Only on the third day, the accident was reported for the first time on central television in the evening TV program “Vremya” (“Time”), and the next day, short reports began to appear in the columns of newspapers. Such reports were very superficial and did not reveal the extent of the disaster.

ImageNewspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” from May 4: a note about how members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU visited the area of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant. However, most of the text was devoted to the list of their surnames

For example, in the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” No. 104, dated May 4, 1986, in the style of Soviet propaganda, the first page featured articles about the significant achievements of the Soviet people in various spheres of life, even a small space was allocated for a note entitled “Visit to the Chernobyl region atomic station”, where all the members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU who visited the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and checked the adopted measures to normalize the situation were listed with great honor.

Celebration during Nuclear disaster

ImageMay 1, 1986 on October Revolution Square (Independence Square).
Photo: TsDKFFA of Ukraine 

Almost immediately, the Soviet government faced a difficult dilemma: to celebrate the May holidays with propaganda pomp, or to start an information campaign among the population. Despite the danger, the Soviet government decided to proceed with the May Day parade in Kyiv. The government claimed that the radiation levels were not high enough to pose a danger to the public. 

ImageMay Day demonstration in Kyiv, 1986.

In Kyiv, May Day festivities were in full swing, with parades, music, and people coming together to commemorate the labor movement. Little did they know that the world was witnessing one of the worst nuclear disasters in history. 

ImageMay Day demonstration in Kyiv, 1986.

Thousands of people gathered in the city center – children held balloons, families enjoyed the festivities, and people marched through the streets, unaware of the invisible danger that surrounded them. The air was tainted with radioactive particles, posing a serious threat to the health of those exposed. 

ImageThe people of Kyiv were informed about the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant only on April 28-29 — a small note on the last page of the Vechirnii Kyiv” newspaper, which by no means reflected the scale of the disaster.

Even the First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Ukrainian SSR, Volodymyr Shcherbytsky, must come to the holiday with their whole family, including their grandchildren in order not to suspect anything.

The May Day demonstration in Kyiv ended with people going home tired with dry mouths. And the reason was not in an excessively hot spring day, but in the influence of invisible, odorless and tasteless radiation.

As it became known from declassified documents, doctors had to record numerous visits to hospitals with signs of radiation sickness as vegetative-vascular dystonia.

ImageParticipants of the 39th “Peace Cycling Race” in May 1986, Kyiv.
Photo: TsDKFFA of Ukraine 

Surprisingly, the mass actions at the May Day demonstration did not end. Already in five days, on May 6, 1986, the first “Soviet” stage of the 39th International Peace Cycling Race started in Kyiv.

“The Accumulation of Lies”


From the very beginning, the Soviet government took control of the narrative surrounding the Chernobyl disaster. They downplayed the severity of the accident, portraying it as a minor incident that was under control. State-controlled media outlets disseminated misleading information, claiming that there were no casualties and that the situation was swiftly contained. By shaping the narrative, the government aimed to avoid public panic and maintain the illusion of control, but in reality they got distrust, suspicion and a huge amount of lies.

Day by day, they created more and more lies about the Chernobyl catastrophe be using 5 main point of Soviet propaganda:

  1. Denial
  2. Downplaying
  3. Blaming
  4. Censorship
  5. Lie so much not to remember where the truth is.

To deflect blame from systemic failures, the Soviet regime quickly shifted responsibility onto the reactor operators. They painted them as reckless and negligent, placing the blame squarely on their shoulders. Concurrently, they propagated a false narrative of espionage and sabotage, insinuating that the disaster was the result of external enemies rather than internal flaws.

The devastating health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster were systematically downplayed and hidden from the public. Information about the true number of casualties and the long-term health effects of radiation exposure was concealed, leaving affected communities in the dark about the risks they faced. Local authorities were ordered to downplay the risks and reassure residents, leading to a lack of evacuation efforts and inadequate safety measures. The true extent of the radioactive contamination and its immediate and long-term health effects were deliberately withheld from the public, putting thousands of lives at risk.

ImageChernobyl Nuclear Power plant at construction phase, August 1986.
Source: Reddit

Anyone who dared to challenge the official narrative or expose the truth faced severe consequences. Scientists, journalists, and whistleblowers who tried to reveal the real magnitude of the disaster were silenced or discredited. Their voices were drowned out by the overwhelming propaganda machinery, and their warnings went unheard, allowing the government to maintain a facade of control and competence.

In addition to controlling information domestically, the Soviet government sought to downplay the international response to the disaster. They minimized the offers of assistance from foreign countries and international organizations, portraying themselves as capable of handling the situation independently. This tactic aimed to preserve the image of Soviet technological prowess and prevent the revelation of any vulnerabilities or weaknesses.

ImageOne of the first photos of the Chernobyl NPP in the newspaper “Vechirnii Kyiv”.

In the autumn, the first pictures of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant were published, of course from the right angle. The systematic hushing up of the scale of the disaster nullified Gorbachev’s “publicity”, even more, the disaster became a sentence for the entire Soviet state, a kind of culmination, after which came the inevitable end of the “Country of the Soviets”.

Even the KGB criticizes the coverage of the events surrounding the Chernobyl accident:

If we talk about the coverage of events, it is worth noting that there are doubts, for example, the showing of a number of stories on television. The head of a collective farm is standing in a field near Chernobyl and assures that the collective farm is exceeding the plan for sowing. This is, of course, good, but the question is therefore, whether this harvest will be suitable for consumption. If the soil is not contaminated with radioactive substances, then it was necessary to say exactly that, and it is even better to refrain from showing dubious quality plots that cause double interpretation.” (From the message of the 1st Department of the KGB of the Ukrainian SSR dated May 7, 1986).

The Legacy of 

ImageConcrete sarcophagus over the destroyed fourth power unit of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, 1989.
Photo: Alexander Klimenko

In the years since the Chernobyl disaster, there has been much debate about the role of communist propaganda in concealing the truth about the disaster. Some argue that the Soviet government was simply trying to protect its citizens from panic, while others argue that the government was deliberately trying to cover up the extent of the disaster. The Chernobyl disaster is a good reminder how dangerous is communist propaganda. When a government is willing to lie to its own people, it is capable of anything. 

ImageChernobyl trial: Anatoly Dyatlov (seated, leaning forward) is among six defendants attending trial for their role in the Chernobyl disaster.
Photo: Igor Kostin

The consequences of the Communist propaganda surrounding the Chernobyl disaster are far-reaching. The delayed acknowledgment of the severity of the accident led to a delayed response, exacerbating the spread of radioactive contamination and increasing the long-term health risks. It also eroded public trust, as people realized they had been deliberately misled by their own government. The Chernobyl disaster stands as a testament to the dangers of state-controlled information and the devastating impact of propaganda on public safety and accountability.

ImageThe Chernobyl NPP, 1988.
Source: Reddit

Whatever the motivation, there is no doubt that the Soviet government’s use of propaganda had a significant impact on the way the Chernobyl disaster was perceived by the public. The government’s lies and censorship made it difficult for people to understand the true extent of the disaster, and this led to a great deal of fear and uncertainty.

The Chernobyl nuclear disaster was not only a technological and environmental catastrophe but also a tragic example of how Communist propaganda can distort the truth and endanger lives. The Soviet government’s efforts to cover up the severity of the disaster through controlled narratives, information suppression, and discrediting dissent had profound consequences. By understanding and acknowledging these propaganda tactics, we can strive for transparency, accountability, and the promotion of accurate information in order to prevent similar tragedies in the future.




If you waited for a sign,
this is it...

You are using an outdated browser. You can update it on this page.